BIA quality
Twenty deterministic rules validate coherence and credibility of your BIA data.
RecoveryAssure
Your BIA says what the business needs. RecoveryAssure tells you whether you can actually recover.
A deterministic engine tests every recovery requirement against the technology, people, suppliers, and test evidence you already record. The engine is authoritative; AI is used only for interpretation, and every claim is traceable to the source cell it came from.
The problem
Most BCM tools store RTOs, dependencies, strategies, tests. But inconsistencies can remain hidden.
A recovery-time target of four hours on paper does not mean the application can be recovered in four hours. Suppliers, staffing, workarounds, and test evidence often quietly contradict the documented requirement. Auditors and regulators want defensible answers — spreadsheets alone cannot provide them.
What we analyse
The full stack of recovery evidence, one deterministic run.
Dependency conflicts
Upstream / downstream RTAs are tested against every process they support.
Recovery capability
Nine-dimension feasibility model per process, separating claimed from demonstrated evidence.
Staffing & people
Minimum-staff, key-person, cross-training checks — not just headcount totals.
Workarounds
Duration, capacity, tested-status, and MBCO coverage evaluated as a bridge, not a substitute.
Suppliers
Contractual recovery targets compared against the process RTO of every dependent business function.
Demonstrated test results
Latest DR test evidence is the source of truth — stale or missing tests degrade confidence explicitly.
How it works
Four steps from BIA workbook to defensible recovery assurance.
- 1
Import your BIA data
XLSX, CSV, or JSON. Read-only, data-only ingest — macros and OLE content are rejected before parsing. Ambiguous units are surfaced, never silently interpreted.
- 2
Deterministic analysis
Twenty code-defined rules run against every process. Feasibility is derived from nine dimensions with explicit workaround bridges. Nothing is generated by an LLM.
- 3
AI interpretation (labelled)
Where AI is used for phrasing recommendations or explaining findings, its output is labelled INFERRED and rejected if it contradicts the deterministic result.
- 4
Human review with evidence
Every claim traces back to the source cell. Runs are immutable and content-hashed. Auditors and regulators get a defensible artefact, not opinions.
Differentiation
Not another BCM platform.
RecoveryAssure works with the BCM information you already have — spreadsheets, application catalogues, DR test records — and answers the question that BCM platforms leave to auditors: does the recovery you documented actually hold up?
- Deterministic engine — every finding is code-defined and versioned.
- Immutable analysis runs — content hashed, reproducible byte-for-byte.
- Content-hashed audit receipts — tamper-evident, exportable to auditors.
- Transparent methodology — the pipeline is public and documented.
- AI is labelled and constrained — it never overrides the engine.
Who this is for
Regulated enterprises and the consultants who serve them.
Enterprises with existing BCM
Financial services, healthcare, utilities, and critical infrastructure operators who already run a BCM programme and need defensible answers to the question of whether recovery actually holds up.
BCM consultants
Practitioners engaged to review, remediate, or audit a client's business continuity programme — RecoveryAssure produces the evidence trail your engagement report can cite.
Trust
Every finding is defensible. Every fact is traceable. The engine, not the AI, is authoritative.
RecoveryAssure separates BIA quality from recovery feasibility, and both from validation confidence. Deterministic and AI outputs are rendered in different visual layers so a reviewer never confuses interpretation with truth.
Read the methodologyReady to test your recovery assurance?
30-minute walkthrough on your own BIA data — pilot workspace on the house.